I will address this momentarily, but before I do, consider the following:įirst, the fact that only a few in scripture had such encounters with God ought to be an indicator to us that such experiences are rare. There were instances in the Bible where people saw God (his form, and/or his glory), not many but only a few, and no one saw his face. Before I answer it I want to say there are many reasons why Christians should reject Kat Kerr’s claims but the most obvious one ought to be her claims of having seen God. Thank you for the comment, and that is a very good question. So help me define well the context in which we are looking at the aspect of SEEING GOD. Like if a man stands before God’s throne, and he beholds the brilliance of his essence, is this enough for us to say he has seen God or not? The first thing I would like to understand is, what is SEEING GOD in this context? Is it about seeing all the details of his face? If a man sees the form of God in his brilliance, can we say he has seen God or he hasn’t? And it’s clear from your standpoint that no one can see God. It seems your main argument is about SEEING GOD. Here is the commenters response to the article: Hopefully it will be helpful for those who want the truth. I recently received a very good question in response to my article on Kat Kerr.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |